The safety of NSAIDs is under constant review at the moment following the concerns raised by the withdrawal of some of the newer COX-II Selective NSAIDs. The MHRA review has already been reported on this site.
All interventions made by the NHS, including prescribing drugs, involves an assessment of the risks of the intervention and the likely benefits. The spotlight on NSAID safety has made us all aware of the gastro-intestinal, renal and cardio-vascular risks associated with all NSAIDs.
It is therefore timely to consider a greater use of analgesics that are not NSAIDs. Using a stepped approach to analgesia with Paracetamol as a core component would be a rational approach in all conditions that are not inflammatory for the majority of the time, for example osteoarthritis.
Action: Where analgesia is required for uncomplicated pain, use the following ladder approach before considering NSAIDs or other alternative treatments.
- Paracetamol 500mg tablets, Two four times a day when required
- Co-codamol 8/500mg tablets, Two four times a day when required
- Co-dydramol 10/500mg tablets, Two four times a day when required
- Co-codamol 30/500mg tablets, Two four times a day when required
Note: This approach does not apply to complicated pain, for example Rheumatoid Arthritis, Cancer Pain and Trigeminal Neuralgia
NICE published a Clinical Guideline for Hypertension in August 2004. This guideline was based on the evidence available at the time and was probably dramatically influenced by the ALLHAT Study1.
This Study was conducted in about 42,000 patients and compared active treatments as follows:
- Thiazide Diuretic (Chlorthalidone)
- ACE Inhibitor (Lisinopril)
- Calcium Channel Blocker (Amlodipine)
- Alpha Blocker (Doxazosin)
Based upon the results of this trial there are two key findings that altered (or should alter) daily practice. Firstly, the Doxazosin arm of this study was stopped early as patients in this group were suffering more outcome events than any other arm. It was therefore decided it was unethical to continue this arm of the study and as a consequence of these steps Doxazosin is a fifth line antihypertensive agent.
The ultimate finding of the study was that there is little to choose between the remaining three arms in terms of clinical efficacy in terms of "hard" outcomes like fatal and non-fatal MI. There were differences in blood pressure control between the groups where the Thiazide Diuretic performed well against the other drugs with amlodipine proving better in diastolic pressure only. While the differences are statistically significant, the clinical differences are negligible (0.8 - 2mmHg difference).
This then leaves the only difference for evaluation between the drug arms to be that of cost. As Thiazide Diuretics as the most cost effective option there simply must be the first line treatment for hypertension.
Second line options are added based upon emerging evidence around the risk of diabetes when Beta Blockers are used in conjunction with Thiazide Diuretics. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) are preferential in those patients who are at higher risk of developing diabetes.
Action: The NICE Guideline is evidence based and should be followed by all clinicians treating Hypertension in Primary Care. For full details of the algorithm, see the Clinical Guideline Quick Reference.
For each of the NICE recommended drug classes the following drugs are recommended:
- Thiazide Diuretic - Bendroflumethiazide 2.5mg
- Beta Blocker - Atenolol 50mg or Bisoprolol 5mg
- ACE Inhibitor - Ramipril or Perindopril (Titrated to maximum tolerated dose)
- Calcium Channel Blocker - Amlodipine (as Mesilate) or Felodipine
ONLY if ACE Inhibitor is not tolerated
- Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers - Candesartan or Irbesartan or Valsartan
References
- Major Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group JAMA 2002;288:2981-2997