Statins Update

July 27, 2006 at 10:54 am | In Prescribing Formulary | Print Print | 3 Comments

Earlier this year the Summaries of Product Characteristics (SPC) for Atorvastatin (Lipitor®) and Ezetimibe/Simvastatin (Inegy®) were updated. These new documents list details of the expected reductions in total cholesterol from untreated baseline results.

A previous article has suggested a stepped approach to lipid management however the information in the updated SPCs has changed this advice.

Simvastatin 40mg is still the first line choice. Based upon an expected additional cholesterol reduction, atorvastatin 40mg is second line. Third line is atorvastatin 80mg.

Reversion to simvastatin 40mg with the addition of ezetimibe is no longer recommended as a third line option as the additional reduction in cholesterol is very small. The expected reduction in total cholesterol is 39% compared to a 38% expected reduction with the second line choice.

Action: The revised stepwise approach to lipid management is as suggested below:

  • Simvastatin 40mg tablets – expected total cholesterol reduction of 30%
  • Atorvastatin 40mg tablets – expected total cholesterol reduction of 38%
  • Atorvastatin 80mg tablets – expected total cholesterol reduction of 46%

Copyright ©2006 Prescribing Advice for GPs

3 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. How high does your cholestral have to be to take simvastatin 40mg?

    Comment by susan palmer — August 22, 2007 #

  2. Susan,

    It’s not really a question about how high your cholesterol is alone, but more of a question of how high your personal risk of having a cardiovascular event (like aheart attack or stroke) in the next ten years is based upon your risk factors, one of which is your cholesterol.

    The risk prediction should also take into consideration your age, gender, smoking status and blood pressure as a minimum with additional corrections for other factors like diabetes, obesity and family history.

    Comment by Matthew Robinson — August 22, 2007 #

  3. [...] Action: This study provides no justification for using rosuvastatin ahead of other statins with lower acquisition costs in patients over 60 years of age with heart failure. Cholesterol management should continue in line with current recommendations. Bookmark to: What are these? Copyright ©2007 Prescribing Advice for GPs [...]

    Pingback by Prescribing Advice for GPs » Rosuvastatin disappoints in HF — November 6, 2007 #

Leave a comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Prescribing Advice for GPs is powered by WordPress.
Subscribe for Free to our RSS Feed for New Entries.
Akismet has protected Prescribing Advice for GPs from 5,569 spam comments.