<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OFT recommends overhaul of PPRS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prescriber.org.uk/2007/02/20/oft-recommends-overhaul-of-pprs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prescriber.org.uk/2007/02/20/oft-recommends-overhaul-of-pprs/</link>
	<description>An NHS Prescribing Advisers' Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prescribing Advice for GPs &#187; King&#8217;s Fund supportive of OFT on PPRS</title>
		<link>http://www.prescriber.org.uk/2007/02/20/oft-recommends-overhaul-of-pprs/#comment-2725</link>
		<dc:creator>Prescribing Advice for GPs &#187; King&#8217;s Fund supportive of OFT on PPRS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prescriber.org.uk/?p=322#comment-2725</guid>
		<description>[...] reported yesterday, the OFT has recommended that the scheme is overhauled and replaced with a patient-focussed value [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reported yesterday, the OFT has recommended that the scheme is overhauled and replaced with a patient-focussed value [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
